On Jewish Justice

Jewish Justice? There is no such animal! Jewish Vengeance then?  Yes! In this they excel! To prove the point let us revisit one of the most infamous trials in world history.

Nuremberg – October 16, 1946 – After a Soviet-style show trial eleven high-ranking officials of defeated National Socialist Germany were hanged for their role in the “crimes” of the Third Reich.

nurembergtrial

Amongst them was Julius Streicher.  Streicher had no part in either the planning or the conduct of World War II. He wasn’t even in the government. In fact, he was considered persona non grata by some powerful men such as Goering, Himmler, Hess and many others who agitated to have Streicher’s weekly newspaper, DER STURMER banned as being too anti-Semitic. During the war years Streicher was actually placed under house arrest by Hitler!

Streicher

So what was his crime? In his newspaper Streicher had openly discussed the Jewish Problem. As he was self-evidently not guilty of any involvement in the war he was charged with “crimes against humanity by stirring up hatred against the Jews.” This was not then nor is it now a crime!

Unless you allow yourself to be fooled into thinking that the “rules and guidelines” of a commercial corporation, your government, so-called, are laws!

In brief: he was brought to justice Jewish style! Or put differently: he was lynched!  He was innocent and died for his passionate commitment to expose Jews, Judaism and Zionism through his speeches and writings.

Hate crime! Sounds familiar, does it not? It should – because it is crystal-clear to anybody who has his eyes and ears open that the Yid is now busy, all over the world,  to create so-called “hate crime laws”. The purpose of such laws is obvious: camouflaged as benevolent laws to protect  minorities perceived to be vulnerable – ethnic, religious, political, etc. etc. – they are really intended to benefit  only one such minority: Jewry!

These “laws” aim to prevent independent research, to eliminate dissent and to remove free speech. In other words: they aim to keep the world in continued darkness about the Chosenites’ nefarious activities, past, present and as planned for the future! In Germany, for example, you can go to jail for up to five years for the “hate crime” of holocaus denial. That’s unusually cruel punishment for something that no sane man would consider a crime, even if the holocaust were a proven fact which it definitely is not! If the Yid succeeds in his endeavour to introduce a New World Order then Streicher’s brutal fate may well be what is in store for those whom the Jews hate! And that’s pretty much every non-Jew!

Back to Nuremberg. Sreicher’s fate, like that of his co-defendants, was a foregone conclusion. The chief US prosecutor and a former US Attorney General, Robert Jackson, made no secret of the lawless nature of the tribunal by declaring:

a) that the tribunal “is a continuation of the war effort of the Allied nations”

b) that the tribunal “is not bound by the procedural and substantive refinements of our respective judicial or constitutional system …”

In other words: he was saying quite openly “To hell with justice!”

There were decent men possessed of a conscience who voiced their dissent – not unexpectedly, they were ignored.

In October 1946 US Senator Robert A. Taft stated:

“The trial of the vanquished by the victors cannot be impartial no matter how it is hedged about with the forms of justice”

Taft went on:

“About this whole judgment there is the spirit of vengeance, and vengeance is seldom justice. The hanging of the eleven men convicted will be a blot on the American record which we will long regret. In these trials we have accepted the Russian idea of the purpose of trials — government policy and not justice — with little relation to Anglo-Saxon heritage. By clothing policy in the forms of legal procedure, we many discredit the whole idea of justice in Europe for years to come.”

Wisconsin Representative Lawrence H. Smith stated in Congress: “The Nuremberg trials are so repugnant to the Anglo-Saxon principles of justice that we must forever be ashamed of that page in our history … The Nuremberg farce represents a revenge policy at its worst.”

And this farce was set in motion and carried out at the behest and with the unstinting support of “those whom you are not allowed to name”.

Two Jewish officers in the US Army, Lieutenant Colonel Murray Bernays and Colonel David Marcus played key roles.

As per historian Robert Conot, it was Bernays who was “the guiding spirit leading the way to Nuremberg.”  Bernays, a New York attorney, persuaded US War Secretary Henry Stimson and others to accept the idea of putting the German leaders on trial.

Marcus was the chief of the US government’s War Crimes Branch in 1946/1947, and it was he who  selected almost all of the judges, prosecutors and lawyers for the Nuremberg Trials. As a fervent Zionist he later became a commander of the “Haganah” military forces in Palestine. But, of course, that’s just a coincidence, nothing to worry about! There is no way that he would have allowed prejudice against the Germans to influence his decisions. Jews do not do such things! Perish the thought! This most ethical nation is only interested in justice!

Jewish organizations, while not officially involved in the proceedings, were nevertheless untiring in their hysterical propaganda efforts to keep the world’s and the tribunal’s focus on Jews and their alleged suffering.

Chief Prosecutor for the US, Robert H. Jackson,  in his opening address to the Tribunal declared:

“The most savage and numerous crimes planned and committed by the Nazis were those against the Jews … It is my purpose to show a plan and design, to which all Nazis were fanatically committed, to annihilate all Jewish people…. The avowed purpose was the destruction of the Jewish people as a whole… The conspiracy or common plan to exterminate the Jews was … methodically and thoroughly pursued… History does not record a crime ever perpetrated against so many victims or one ever carried out with such calculated cruelty.”

The Jews, as ever, needed to take centre stage!

On Sept. 25, 1945, Tom Dodd, the second in command on the American prosecution team at Nuremberg, made the following observations:

Dodd

“You know how I have despised anti-Semitism. You know how strongly I feel toward those who preach intolerance of any kind. With that knowledge — you will understand when I tell you that this staff is about seventy-five percent Jewish (emphasis mine BJW). Now my point is that the Jews should stay away from this trial — for their own sake. For — mark this well — the charge ‘a war for the Jews’ is still being made and in the post-war years it will be made again and again. The too large percentage of Jewish men and women here will be cited as proof of this charge. Sometimes it seems that the Jews will never learn about these things. They seem intent on bringing new difficulties down on their own heads. I do not like to write about this matter —it is distasteful to me — but I am disturbed about it. They are pushing and crowding and competing with each other and with everyone else.”

The Nuremberg Tribunal, in its Old -Testament-style thirst for revenge, knowingly and intentionally violated every single principle of justice.  To mention just a few:

The  Allies acted as prosecutor, judge and executioner

 The charges were created ex post facto especially for the occasion

 The charges were applied selectively, i.e. only to the vanquished Germans

 Confessions were extracted under torture and defendants were blackmailed. Streicher was humiliated, viciously beaten, kicked, whipped and burned with cigarettes.

More cruelty was to follow! The hangings were deliberately bungled. The use of a short rope prevented what should have been instantaneous death from a broken neck but guaranteed slow and agonizing strangulation.

Stag Magazine, (Vol. 3, No. 1, December 1946), reported that Woods was a Jew. He boasted to the U.S. Army’s Stars and Stripes newspaper that he enjoyed the task, saying that “hanging those Nazis was the best thing I ever did.”

Streicher went to his death with courage and defiance and the words:  “Purim – 1946!” He died after 14 minutes of slow strangulation. This is Jewish justice vis-a-vis Gentiles!

——————————————————————

As every coin has two sides we now need to look at Jewish justice vis-a-vis members of the tribe.

An Associated Press article appearing on 12-9-1998  in several major papers stated:

“Warsaw – Israel has refused to extradite a Jew accused of atrocities against German prisoners in Poland after WWII, the Polish Justice Ministry said yesterday. Solomon Morel, who commanded the Swietochlowice camp for Germans in southern Poland from February to November 1945, allegedly tortured inmates and is considered responsible for at least 1,538 deaths.  Israel refused Poland’s request for extradition, saying the statute of limitations had run out”.  

For purposes of Jewish revenge statutes of limitations and such a trivial matter as proof or at least probable cause is irrelevant. But when a Jew commits crimes against Gentiles, Israel refuses to extradite! This is not an isolated case. Israel NEVER extradites, no matter how horrendous the crime. It is a principle of Talmudic law that Gentile courts have no jurisdiction over a Jew which makes Israel a perfect sanctuary for all sorts of criminals on the run, something that was foreseen by Hitler:

“….all they want is a central headquarters for their international world swindle, endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed from the intervention of other states: a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university for budding crooks.”

(“Mein Kampf”, Volume I, Chapter 11, pp. 324-325 – HM edition)

In a three-year study done by Amnesty International the Israeli army’s use of force against Palestinians is described as “unnecessary, arbitrary and brutal”. In all cases examined there was no evidence that the Israeli soldiers’ lives were under threat. Self-defence is therefore ruled out and we are left with pre-meditated acts, ranging from malicious wounding to outright murder.  Frequently, the victims are shot in the back while fleeing! More often than not the targets of the trigger-happy soldiers – proud members of the world’s self-proclaimed “most moral army” – are children.

themostmoralarmy

An Israeli army statement said: “The IDF [Israeli Defense Forces] holds itself to the highest of professional standards and trains and equips itself as such. When there is any suspicion of wrong doing, or breach of discipline, the IDF reviews, investigates and takes action where appropriate.

The action taken? In most cases no more than a slap on the wrist! Although the Palestinian victims of these psychopaths number in the thousands Amnesty International says it cannot identify a single case of a member of the Israeli security forces being convicted of “wilfully killing” a Palestinian in the occupied territories for the past 25 years.

According to Yesh Din, an Israeli human rights group, only four soldiers have been convicted of negligent manslaughter and another one of negligence in the past 13 years . None was discharged from the army or received a prison sentence of more than a few months.

oneshotkillstwo

Israeli Army T-Shirt

——————————————————————

In conclusion

We were born – each and everyone of us – free and sovereign human beings, endowed by God or if you prefer Nature, with inalienable rights and furthermore we are equal before the law. These rights are enshrined in and guaranteed by what is unarguably the world’s most advanced legal system, Anglo-Saxon jurisprudence.

You will find these rights in the Magna Carta 1215, in the Bill of Rights 1688, in the Habeas Corpus Act 1679.

Talmudic law on the other hand deems some people, the Jews, more equal than others! Even as a Jew you have very few rights. As a Gentile none! You are no more than the plaything of the rabbis, self-appointed makers and interpreters of Jewish law.

It is easy to understand why a Jew would prefer a Jewish court. But why would any sane and self-respecting Gentile man or woman put his trust in a Jewish court?

“There is no danger of that! I would never go to a Jewish court!” you may say. I have bad news for you. Modern courts in the Western world ARE Jewish courts in disguise! Our court system is in essence a lucrative monopoly run by Jews and their brown-nosing Freemason buddies! These two criminal elements have hijacked our law. They have stealthily and incrementally subverted, perverted and debased it!

jews_image19

And unless we take back what was stolen from us things can only get worse.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.