Vaya Con Dios

Dear Reader!

This blog is now closed. The reason is two-fold:

For the life of me I cannot see anything that could still be said about Jewry and its Satanic religion that hasn’t been said before – a thousand times, most likely! I really do not want to waste my time and energy on re-inventing the wheel or chewing the cud!

The time for talk is long gone. What is required now is ACTION! Each of us is a sovereign human being! Together We The People, have the power to beat the Jew World Order and, in fact, any other kind of tyranny!

How? Remember Who You Are! To jog your memory go to the post I consider the most important one on this blog: LAW There is material there for download that can set you free! Carpe Diem!

“Vaya Con Dios!” (Go with God)

Posted in Uncategorized

The Wagner Hitler Loved

The Wagner Hitler Loved
By Brother Nathanael

Reposted from:

Everyone’s heard of Richard Wagner unless you live in Israel.

He’s tarred as an ‘anti-Semite’ though not a shred can be found in any of his operas.

His works are banned in Israel, and his name despised by Jews worldwide for being Hitler’s ‘composer of choice.’

But blaming Wagner because Hitler used Rienzi at his rallies is like blaming the Rolling Stones for Trump using one of their songs at the end of his Republican Convention speech.

And just because Wagner believed in the German “volk” doesn’t make him a “National Socialist” which was non-existent in his day.

In his opera, Parsifal, Wagner casts Kundry as the ‘wandering Jew’ – exiled from Palestine for mocking Christ when hanging on the Cross.

“I saw Him and laughed,” sings Kundry, and thus was cursed to roam the earth in unending rootlessness.

Since ‘political correctness’ didn’t exist in Wagner’s day, merging art with history was a laudable enterprise.

But not so with modern Jewry which uses this opera to call Wagner an ‘anti-Semite.’

They run amok with their reproach by citing his pamphlet, “Jewishness in Music,” in which Wagner decried the Jewish corruption of Germanic music.

By directing his criticism against Felix Mendelssohn and Giacomo Meyerbeer, Wagner sought to highlight “the involuntary repellence possessed by Germans due to the nature and personality of the Jews.”

Wagner perhaps had in mind Mendelsohn’s Violin Concerto…

…yes, melodious, but hardly “German,” kind of “Hebraic,” but actually, “Slavic”…totally inimical to Wagner’s ideal, as this:

[Clip: Excerpt Valkyries March]

You see, Jews have no culture of their own but have adopted the various cultures and customs of The Diaspora.

Witness the Chasids whose garb and hats spring from Eastern Europe.

“The Jew stands solitarily in a soil-less stock,” wrote Wagner.

“Only those who unconsciously grow up within the bond of Germanic historical community can share in its creations.”

It’s creations like Wagner’s Tannhauser where in “Entrance Of The Guests” music and movement sinks below “consciousness” and a nationalist reverie arises.

[Clip: (music)]

The scene is very un-Jewish:

A medieval landowner and princess; white knights; hierarchical order; unified ethnicity; aristocratic with religious affect—all constituting a nationalist vision that Wagner expressed, Hitler loved…and Jews despise.

There’s nothing more contemptible in the eyes of the Jew than nationalism rooted in Gentile mythic memory.

Wherever it exists, as it did in post-Weimar Germany, Jews seek to destroy it.

You won’t hear it in Israel where Wagner is banned.

But wherever his heroic vision sounds forth beyond Israel’s borders….

…it reveals—by sharp relief—the sterility of a barren Jewish state of mind.

Posted in Uncategorized

Beware The PharMafia And Its Whores In Your Government

Victoria, Australia, has mandated that children should see a doctor at least once a week to receive drugs and medical treatment without parental consent

by Tracey Watson


Reposted from:

(Natural News)
A $43.8 million (about $33 million U.S. Dollar) state-run initiative called “Doctors in Secondary Schools” has been rolled out in the state of Victoria, Australia. This program promises to “fund general practitioners (GPs) to attend up to 100 Victorian government secondary schools up to one day a week to provide medical advice and health care to those students most in need.” While the concept of providing free medical care for in-need teens sounds great on the surface, it has been met with a storm of controversy, for multiple reasons.

For one thing, many see this as a way for the state to line the pockets of Big Pharma and government officials with ties to drug companies. These connections run all the way to the top, with The Mind Unleashed reporting that Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull and his wife are connected to some of the biggest of all Big Pharma corporations. For example, while the prime minister has pushed for government-mandated vaccinations, his wife serves as chair of the pharmaceutical corporation Prima Biomed.

Many parents are also gravely concerned about their daughters being issued with contraceptive pills at school without their knowledge or consent. Of course, the mainstream media mocks their fears, with Matt Young of saying, “I’m here to slap some reality into that overly-cautious parental mind of yours. We don’t live in a perfect world. And sadly, parents, your teenagers are going to have sex and probably not tell you about it. Just like my generation, and yours, did all those years back. How refreshing though that this generation will have an expert to talk to about it confidentially.”

The wording of the program is also of great concern to many parents, since it mandates that even if a parent “expressly states” that they do not want their child to receive medical treatment from these doctors, the GP can go ahead and do so as long as he or she deems the child to be “mature enough.”

The program also promises to provide “primary health care” to these kids, but never clarifies what this health care will consist of. Will it include vaccinations? Will children whose parents have carefully prevented them from receiving dangerous vaccines be given these shots anyway, without permission? Most likely, these teens will have the HPV vaccine pressed on them, especially if they’ve been handed contraceptives and effectively given the green light to start having sex. Children worldwide have suffered horrific side effects and life-altering disabilities after receiving this vaccine, and it has actually been banned in several countries, but this is not likely to prevent doctors from administering it at these weekly “health care” visits.

And what about psych evaluations? Hormonal swings mean that teenagers are notoriously all over the place when it comes to their moods. Most parents are aware of this and monitor their kids carefully. That doesn’t mean that kids need to be given antidepressants and other psychotropic drugs to cope. Nonetheless, the number of children being handed prescriptions for these drugs has risen dramatically in the past few years, and the doctors in the Australian program are likely to follow the trend. This means that children could be given mind-altering drugs which are known to cause suicidal behavior in teenagers without the knowledge or consent of their parents.

While Victoria, Australia, may seem very far away, similar government policies have been instituted in the U.S. with many states refusing unvaccinated children entrance to schools and day care facilities. A Texas lawmaker recently made the statement that the second a child is removed from their home they become “a child of the state,” and that such children should receive whatever medical treatment the state deems fit as soon as possible. Governments worldwide are exerting more and more control over children, doing their best to sever the ties that bind kids to their parents.


Posted in Uncategorized

On Tolerance

In today’s post I present to you one of the Letters To The Editor – titled “Tolerance” – which I found in the Saturday 10th, June 2017 issue of The Chronicle (Toowoomba, Qld./Australia).

Over the nearly two decades of my living in Toowoomba there has been a steadily increasing influx of non-white non-Christian immigrants. As this is my home I feel that I have not only the right but the obligation to have an opinion on this and to express it publicly and to hell with political correctness.



Is tolerance a two-way street?

How many readers think it would be fair and reasonable for a Christian to walk into an Islamic study and hand out invitations to a Christian celebration?

For all of you who think that would be unacceptable, be aware, in a State School in Toowoomba a Muslim woman was given permission to interrupt a Christian religious instruction lesson to hand out invitations to a Muslim celebration.

None of those children attending the Christian class would have been allowed to attend without parental consent.

As Christian religious instructors are not permitted to give out invitations to Christian activities, I see this whole exercise as totally unacceptable. It was hardly courteous to interrupt the class in any case.

F. Barnes, Toowoomba


Good on you, F. Barnes! Whoever you are! Although I am not a Christian myself I am with you on this! I know for a fact that there are indeed many more who – unfortunately only silently – share your disapproval of this sneaky attempt to insinuate Islam into the minds of guileless children who would have no way of seeing Islam for what it is – a mortal danger to the fabric of our society!

So, Christians of Toowoomba (and all of Australia, of course) why are you not outraged and why are you not making your outrage publicly known – en masse? Let’s make it clear to Muslims that their crude proselytism targeting children is not welcome and let’s make it clear to those bleeding-hearts do-gooders and to the government-sponsored social engineers behind this sordid piece of political-correctness that their not-so-subtle promotion of Islam is completely unacceptable.

Dear Malcolm! Why Is That Important? That’s A Piece Of Turnbullshit!

Then again, the action of this Muslim woman does not in the least surprise me seeing that Islam is an arrogant and aggressive missionary religion. I expect no better from brain-dead fanatics. She just did what zealots of every stripe do: blinded by self-righteousness and hubris these “Holier Than Thou” miscreants ride roughshod over others! They can’t help it – they are utterly incapable of respect for others and thus incapable of gracious conduct!

But I do have a problem with that moron of a principal and/or teacher who granted her permission. And I have an even bigger problem with the people of Toowoomba, and especially the parents, who let this kind of behaviour go unchallenged!

What do you think would happen if you were to hand out invitations to Christian celebrations and/or material promoting Christianity to Muslim or Jewish children? Such activity would be indignantly and vehemently rejected and – who knows? – you might even be dragged into court on some trumped-up charges under the disgusting “hate/thought crime” legislation. After all, Muslims and Jews might feel ever so “offended and humiliated and threatened”. Oh dear, oh dear! Can’t have that, can we? God forbid! But even if the response were couched in polite language and delivered with a smile it would be a resounding “NO!”

Are Christians exceptionally kind-hearted, broad-minded and tolerant people? Or are they perhaps exceptionally stupid? Too stupid to see that Jews as well as Muslims have nothing but contempt for and even hatred of Christianity and Christians? Both Muslims and Jews have absolutely no intention of returning the goodwill that Christian society extends to them! Quite the contrary: both make no secret of the fact that they see Christianity as an idolatrous abomination that ought to be abolished. They may not say so to your face but make no mistake: this is what most of them are thinking and this is what their religious leaders are working towards!

Muslims want to replace Christianity with Islam and its barbaric Sharia law while Jews plan on imposing their equally barbaric Noahide laws on us. Muslims and Jews have no respect whatsoever for such noble concepts as freedom of religion, and, in fact, they have no respect for freedom of any kind. Both Islam and Judaism are totalitarian mind control systems opposed to the values that European civilization holds dear and upon which this country of ours was built!

Don’t believe me? Harsh words? If you really want to know what tolerance and religious freedom mean to Jews and Muslims I suggest that you visit Israel where I have lived for four years. This is a country where you might see the New Testament burnt or shredded publicly. Where Christians might be, quite literally, spat upon. A country where people publicly and with impunity refer to Palestinians, many of whom are Christians, as animals and call for their expulsion or worse – death! That is tolerance? Really?

Or perhaps you might prefer to go to Saudi-Arabia, the birthplace of Islam, in order to spread your Christian faith? Frankly, I don’t like your chances! This is a country where you are not even allowed to practise Christianity let alone publicly promote it. You’ll be exceedingly lucky if the Saudis just chuck you out of the country with your head and limbs still attached!

Yet the very same people will take advantage of the tolerance of Christian societies. They will unashamedly demand and happily enjoy rights they are not prepared to grant to others! I will not mince words: there is something fundamentally wrong with such people and their ethics!


“Eh? Intolerant – me? Never! As long as you agree with me and do what I say
we’ll get along just fine!”


It seems to me that right now Muslims are just testing the water! However, if you take this lying down, if you do nothing to resist such impertinence, they will grow bolder and it won’t be long before they resort to more forceful ways of “making you see the light”.

Do nothing and next time this woman will not even ask for permission! Do nothing and the step after that will be government-mandated Islamic studies in our schools! Do nothing and soon there will be what? ……. conversion to Islam at the point of the sword, perhaps?

To be sure there are exceptions, there are some countries with a predominantly Muslim population where non-Muslims enjoy equality. Assad’s multi-cultural Syria is one such place. Tolerant Muslims are good people not because Islam is a religion of peace, compassion and tolerance (it isn’t!). Such people are good people despite the egregious teachings of Islam!!!

As I am not a Christian myself I will not presume to interpret Christian teachings but I am pretty sure that Jesus would want you to be true to your Christian faith.

Tolerance IS a two-way street!
Reserve it for those who reciprocate!
Don’t waste it on those that will spit on what you hold dear!

We have not only the right but the moral obligation to defend ourselves, our families, our nation, our religious, cultural and moral values!

Let’s give Muslims and Jews a taste of their own medicine! Let’s grant them the exact same rights they grant to people of other faiths and nothing more. Seems like a fair and just arrangement to me.

Unless we rein in Muslims and Jews this is what will await us in the not-so-distant future: DEATH. Under Sharia law and the Noahide laws the punishment for anybody who is deemed to be an idolater is death. Make no mistake: both legal systems define Christianity as idolatry!

Don’t say then that you didn’t know!


Text below reposted from:

Jewish War on Free Speech

In this week’s edition of the Jewish War on Free Speech; we begin with the news that in the United States the Muslim-Jewish Advisory Council is now pushing the Protecting Affiliated Institutions Act, which would see all so-called ‘hate crimes’ automatically classed as felonies rather than misdemeanours. (1)

Meanwhile in Tennessee; Congressman David Kustoff is seeking to impose tougher sentences on so-called ‘hate crimes’, which clearly undermines the very idea of free speech having a continued existence in the American body politic.

This is ominous enough, but Marco Rubio and his establishment Republican confreres along with a bunch of pro-Israel fanatics from the Democrat party are pushing for the position of the State Department’s Special Envoy on anti-Semitism to be both an ambassadorial level role, but also one cannot be combined with any other so that the incumbent has to spend one hundred percent of their time promoting the idea of eternal jewish victim hood and the culpability and guilt of the evil goyim for that sorry state of things. (3)

Add to this; the fact that the Times of Israel has been shrieking about ‘hate crimes’ and advocating harsher punishments against those who dare utter word ‘Jew’ in vain, (4) while screaming about ‘Free Palestine’ clothing being sold on Jeff Bezos’ Amazon (5) and not to be outdone Fox’s jewish-run subsidiary Heat Street has been strenuously objecting to a ‘Holocaust wound’ being sold as fancy dress on the same site. (6)

The jewish-dominated Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) has also been busy this week labelling anti-Zionist group ‘Deir Yassin Remembered’ – some of whose members I know as it happens – as both a group that ‘denies the Holocaust’ – whatever that is supposed to mean – and which is ‘anti-Semitic’. (7)

While the Jewish Daily Forward has been going bonkers about people in Portland, Oregon publicly challenging the accepted narrative of 9/11 and suggesting jews were involved; (8) Rabbi Yisroel Hahn of Spokane, Washington is demanding that the local police department track down and arrest people for thought crime for daring to criticise his ‘Holocaust Survivor’ event on Facebook. (9)

Pink Floyd’s Roger Waters is also in hot water with the jewish community again for having the temerity to actually have a spine and condemn the state of Israel, while endorsing the Boycott Divestment and Sanctions movement. (10)

Charles Small – who is currently squatting in an academic chair for reasons that I know not – has effectively declared war on Waters because he perceives that Waters’ voice and reach is something that the Israel Lobby cannot easily combat without resorting to bully boy tactics. (11)

These tactics have similarly been used – along with simple blackmail – to get the University of California at Fresno to scrap its ‘Middle East Studies’ course, because it is insufficiently pro-Israel. (12) While Harvard has rescinded offers to students who were found to be part of a private Facebook group that joked about subjects that are held to be beyond criticism, (13) which action has been applauded by the jewish community. (14)

In further disturbing news; the Kansas state senate has voted to effectively criminalise criticism of Israel, (15) which is not being put into action in Bulgaria with jewish organisation clamouring for the government to round up and imprison those it perceives as opponents. (16)

The question are: when will this happen and what are we going to do about it?




Comment by Bernard Weckmann:

Free speech just for Jews and Muslims? I think not!!! Let’s gag these fucking miscreants, Jew and Muslim alike – exactly the way they’d like to gag us!


Here is another piece of the Jew-manipulated political-correctness lunacy:

Christian School Told They Can’t Teach ‘Offensive’ Scripture

Evangelical Christians are under fire as an Alberta school board is demanding a Christian school stop teaching “offensive” scripture that indicts homosexuality as a sin, the National Post reports.

The offending passage is from 1 Corinthians 6:9-10, which states: “Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor men who have sex with men nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.”

The Battle River School Division (BRSD) first asked Cornerstone Christian Academy, not far from the Alberta capital of Edmonton, to remove the scripture from the school’s statement of faith. They also asked that the word “quality” be redacted from the mission statement that the school offers “quality educational programming.”

CCA agreed to the demands. Board chairwoman Laurie Skori then said that wouldn’t be enough. The school would have to cease from even teaching the scripture, saying that “any scripture that could be considered offensive to particular individuals should not be read or studied in school.” She said exactly what she meant in a subsequent piece of correspondence that read: “For example: any teachings that denigrate or vilify someone’s sexual orientation.”

That was too much for the school. CCA chairwoman Deanna Margel said the school had a right to teach what it wants.

“That’s a completely different directive, and it was shocking. Absolutely shocking,” said Margel.

“You can’t just pick and choose those scriptures,” she told the National Post. “We need every single word there to challenge us, to call us to greater understanding. We’re talking about freedom of religion, but we’re (also) talking about freedom of expression,” she said.

The school, which teaches students from kindergarten to grade 12, has asked the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedom for legal assistance. The conservative activist group that defends “the constitutional freedoms of Canadians through litigation and education” has come to the school’s defense.

“Trustees enjoy the legal right to send their own kids to various schools that align with the parents’ beliefs and convictions. But these trustees have no right to impose their own ideology on schools they disagree with,” said the group’s president, John Carpay, in a statement.

Spokeswoman for the school board, Diane Hutchinson, said they are making the demands because “gender and sexual minorities” were added tot the province’s human rights code in 2015.

“In our province there is a heightened awareness and a heightened sensitivity” around LGBTQ issues, she said, downplaying concerns of censorship.

But Carpay says this is about freedom of religion and expression and that “Alberta has one of the most diverse education systems in Canada,” Carpay told the Post. “It’s really contrary to government policy for any school board to try to squelch that diversity.”

If the conflict between the school and the board is not resolved, CCA will have three choices: find a new board, become a private school or shut down.

Posted in Uncategorized

The Damnation Of Confederate Memory

The Damnation Of Confederate Memory

By Brother Nathanael

The new crusade in America is the damnation of national memory, and the elimination of significant blocks of American history from the public sphere.

Everyone was reconciled to the chronicling of the Civil War and the Reunion—including its memorials and symbols—but now Confederate flags, monuments, and name-places, have become the new heresy.

The recent removals of the Confederate flag in South Carolina and the monument of Robert E Lee in Louisiana are just the beginning of our national disintegration.

Behind it all are two powerful Jewish organizations, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) and the Anti-Defamation League (the ADL.)

The SPLC amassed a huge hit list of 1500 Confederate Memorabilia that they’re just itching to take down.

Memorials on private property aren’t safe either.

And while the ADL calls Confederate displays ’symbols of slavery,’ their real scheme is to erase the Jews’ historical predominance in world and domestic slave trade.

The evidence is damning.

In America alone, Jews, in both the South and North, were very active in the “negro” slave trade.

Jews such as Mordechai Cohen, Eliezer Marks, Isaiah Moses, the Levy clan of Mississippi, along with David Franks and Benjamin Levy—who as “Merchants Of Philadelphia”—petitioned to halt a pending duty levied on the heads of their imported slaves.

Yet with all of Jewry’s attempts to erase their participation in the slave trade,

not a peep out of them to take down the statue of Judah Benjamin, the Jewish Secretary of State of the Confederacy.

Their line on Benjamin is he wasn’t a ‘contemptible white slave owner.’

Rather, in a rags-to-riches story, his 213 slaves on his sugar cane plantation, was simply a “clever investment.”

The more things change the more Jews protect their own.

And, as Rahm Emanuel said, never let a crisis go to waste.

That’s exactly what the SPLC and the ADL did with Dylann Roof who killed 9 people at a black church in Charleston, South Carolina, and it set the whole thing off.

You see, they took a really sick white kid on drugs, scraped up a photo of him holding a semi-automatic and Confederate flag, and turned him into a ‘white supremacist.’

The Jews finally got the ammunition to launch their war on Confederate memory, and to further push “White guilt” on the majority of Americans.

Politically correct politicians, and the Jew-owned main stream media, jumped right in.

“Take down the symbol of hatred,” screeched the New York Times.

“It’s the American Swastika!” shrieked another headline.

And one of the first out of the gate to launch the assault after the shooting was Tennessee Rep. Steve Cohen.

His demand?

That the name of legendary cavalryman, Nathan Bedford Forrest, be removed from Forrest Park in Memphis and his bust gone from the capital.

Will he have the park renamed Cohen Park? That’s where we headed with all of this.

And Jewry’s shill, Nikki Haley, quickly signed into law the removal of the Confederate battle flag from the State Capitol grounds.

Look. The confederate flag is not a symbol of hatred, it’s an object of hatred.

The flag doesn’t belong to Dylann Roof, nor to the Jews to dispose of as they wish.

Rather, it was a ‘military’ flag used in battlefields to distinguish the Southern Greys from the Union Blues, just like the uniforms.

It belongs to all Americans in general, and the Southerners in particular, which includes the whites, the blacks, and the Cherokee Indians, who fought in the Confederate army.

But, the Jews decide what Americans can have and what they should be denied.

What’s next?

Smash Mount Rushmore?…since Washington and Jefferson were ’slave holders,’ which was an accepted, lawful institution at that time.

They’re prosecuting stones and fabrics of the past with the ‘politically correct’ BS of today.

Politically-correctness is one thing.

But when it’s weaponized, only Jewish culture survives.

Comment by Bernard Weckmann

You can beat the political-correctness lunacy with Common Law, the only real law there is!
Everything else is “colour of law” or – in other words – PRETEND LAW!
Read my post on the law and download some of the material offered there!: LAW

Posted in Uncategorized

In Memory Of True Warriors

Reposted from:


Deutsche Soldaten

Der Plan war schon um 1900 Deutschland zu zerstoeren zugunsten Englands und  dann Deutschland die Schuld zuzuschieben um noch mehr Geld aus ihr herauzuholen by Reparationen. Weil Deutschland unerwartet “auferstanden” ist, musste es dann im 2. Weltkrieg vollkommen vernichtet werden. Jetzt haben die Internationalen die Weltherrschaft! Was wurde und wird jetzt aus den Menschen, der Schoenheit, Kultur, und Individualitaet der Laenders Europas?








Posted in Uncategorized

Hellstorm = Talmudic Justice = Jewish Vindictiveness

If you do not feel outraged after reading the article below you are either dead or a Jew or one of his shabbes goyim. You sure as hell aren’t human!

You can also watch the documentary HELLSTORM here:

Bernard Weckmann

Mass Rape of German Women & Girls

…Composed largely of Mongols, Kazakhs, Kalmuks, and other Asians, as well as convicts and Jewish commissars, these men who formed the second wave of troops were regarded, even by their own comrades, as utterly merciless. Terrified by the news, many Germans did attempt to flee and move in the wake of the first Soviet wave…

Hellstorm Now in Paperback & Kindle
The Mass Rape of German Women & Girls

Editor’s Note:

hellstormI am delighted to announce that Thomas Goodrich’s Hellstorm, his harrowing saga of Allied atrocities against civilians, especially women, children, and the aged, in the final months and aftermath of World War II is now available in paperback and Kindle. The following excerpt, on the mass rape of German women and girls, reminds us that such rape was a deliberate policy of Jewish/Communist ethnic warfare — something that needs to be borne in mind as today’s mass rape of English girls by Muslim invaders is being spun as just a ghastly oversight rather than a deliberate policy of England’s present-day rulers, who are the spiritual and in some cases blood cousins of the Bolsheviks.

Traumatic as first encounters were, when the [Soviet] shock troops moved off many Germans would concur that the experience had not been as bad as feared. While rapes had occurred and while many German men of military age had been marched east or shot on the spot, the front line soldier was more concerned with fighting and survival than with loot, rape and revenge. Not so with those who followed. In numerous instances, before Red combat officers and men pushed on they turned to the helpless civilians with stone-like faces: “The Mongols are coming. . . . Very bad men. You go quick. Go quick.”

[admin: don’t forget the Americans, the French, the British…they were just as brutal in many cases!!!]

Composed largely of Mongols, Kazakhs, Kalmuks, and other Asians, as well as convicts and Jewish commissars, these men who formed the second wave of troops were regarded, even by their own comrades, as utterly merciless. Terrified by the news, many Germans did attempt to flee and move in the wake of the first Soviet wave. Most, however, found themselves trapped and could do little more than hide young girls and once again pray that their worst fears were unfounded. After a wait of sometimes days, but normally only hours, the dreaded second wave arrived. There were no preliminaries. Unlike storm troops, who cautiously entered towns and villages and slipped nervously from door to door, the rear echelons burst noisily into communities atop trucks, tanks or peasant carts crammed high with loot. Often wildly drunk, many wore a bizarre array of stolen clothes and gaudy jewelry. Adding to the chaos were herds of bellowing cattle and sheep.

“It was almost like a scene from the Middle Ages—a migration, no less,” said one stunned observer.

Soon after the “carnival columns” halted in a German town, hell on earth was unleashed. “It seemed as though the devil himself had come. . . ,” a witness from Silesia wrote. “The ‘Mongol barbarism of the Asiatic plains’ had come not in a propaganda phrase but in the flesh.”
While flames shot up from different corners of the towns and gunfire erupted as citizens were murdered in the streets, the invaders soon began kicking in doors to homes, shops and churches. “[A] whole horde of Asiatic-looking fellows appeared and started searching the cellar… ,” recalled one priest. “The place was a dreadful sight by the time they had finished. The room was already full of smoke and I begged one of the Russians to let us out. . . . Were they going to let us be burnt to death? After a while, however, a more civilized-looking Russian appeared and I repeated my request. He led us out to . . . the courtyard of the convent. The noise was deafening—the raucous shouts of the Russians, the crackling of the flames, the crashing of beams and brickwork.”

Many horrified Germans tried to greet with a smile their strange visitors. Revealed one woman from a boarding house in Berbitz:

As a precaution, the landlord, Mr. Grebmann, had lined the vestibule with liquor bottles in the naive hope that his house might thereby be spared from ransacking. To the succeeding troop of slant-eyed Mongolians, the tenants brought their jewelry and watches. Hysterical, Mrs. Friedel embraced one of the greasy Kirgis and drank with him from the same bottle, and the elderly Mr. Grebmann patted them familiarly on the back. . . . One of the Mongolians held up my Tom’s tall leather boots triumphantly, the other one put my rings into his pants pocket. . . .

Scarcely had this second detachment left the house and we were beginning to breathe freely, when fists once more thundered at the door: thus it kept up the whole day. The house doors were not permitted to be locked any more. Each took what he wanted either in a more or less harmless or in a malicious way. Soon we and the Russians were wading knee-deep in thrown-around clothing, laundry and bits of smashed dishes . . .

As soon as a new detachment of Russians entered the house noisily, we squatted trembling about the round table in Grebmann’s living room. One of the soldiers sat at the table with us with pistol disengaged and demanded schnapps or vodka, while the others rummaged around the house. . . . [N]o one dared to speak. We women sat with downcast eyes and lowered head. Someone had told us never to look a Russian in the eye, otherwise we would be lost . . .

Before long the inside of the house looked as if a band of robbers had lived there. . . . The fellows had cut the beds up into little pieces, slit open the upholstered chairs, thrown furniture around; had slashed pictures, despoiled books, cracked eggs against the wall; had poured liqueur over the rugs, torn curtains down, and scattered the entire contents of all the closets and drawers all over. One of the most painful shocks for me was to see how two of the ruffians with their heavy boots kicked the chest in which I had my beautiful porcelain wrapped in tissue paper and cotton wadding. They were all treasured pieces. . . . My most beautiful piece . . . was used by one of them as a toilet.

As a rule, the Soviets generally sought out gold and jewelry first, with an especial eye for “uri,” or wristwatches. It was not unusual to see Red troops laden with necklaces and gold chains or sporting as many as a dozen watches on each arm. When the people had been plucked clean of valuables, interest usually turned to liquor. In their mad quest for “wodka,” soldiers greedily imbibed everything from fine wines and champagne to rubbing alcohol and perfume. Red troops, observed one woman, were “crazy for anything even smelling of alcohol.”

And then . . .

“Rape was a word that [had] occurred again and again in [our] conversation,” admitted Lali Horstmann. “It was an expression which caused no pang of fear in our times for its meaning was purely figurative—‘to be ravished’ belonged to the realm of lyrical poetry. Now its original sense was terrifyingly restored and brought us face to face with a new peril.”

“Suddenly the door of the room we were in was opened and some soldiers entered,” a frightened boy recalled as he sat with a group of women huddled in a dark room. “One or two matches were struck and I saw that there were about eight Russians in the room who were obviously looking for women.”

The child continues:

As I crouched there in my corner I saw one of the Russians coming towards me. The match he held in his hand went out. I felt, rather than saw, a hand reach out towards me. I had a fur cap on my head, and suddenly I felt fingers tracing curl-like movements on my temple. For a brief moment I did not know what to make of this, but the next instant, when a loud “No” resounded through the room, I thanked God with all my heart that I was not a woman or a girl.

Meanwhile the beasts had spotted their victims and shared them out. Then they suddenly started shooting at random. But it was dark in the room and no one could see where the shots were being fired or who was hit. I heard wails and groans and voices calling out to me to help, but there was nothing I could do. Right next to me poor defenseless women were being ravished in the presence of their children.

Merely because a female had been raped once was no guarantee she would not be assaulted again and again. “Many of the girls were raped as often as ten times a night, and even more,” said a witness from Neustadt.

“There was never a moment’s peace either by day or at night,” added another victim:

The Russians were coming and going the whole time and they kept eyeing us greedily. The nights were dreadful because we were never safe for a moment. The women were raped, not once or twice but ten, twenty, thirty and a hundred times, and it was all the same to the Russians whether they raped mere children or old women. The youngest victim in the row houses where we lived was ten years of age and the oldest one was over seventy. . . . I am sure that wild and hungry animals would not have behaved any differently.

Wrote a girl from Posen who desperately clung to a cousin for safety:

When we were lying in bed at night we kept hearing steps coming up the stairs.
. . . They beat on the door with their rifle-butts, until it was opened. Without any consideration for my mother and aunt, who had to get out of bed, we were raped by the Russians, who always held a machine pistol in one hand. They lay in bed with their dirty boots on, until the next lot came. As there was no light, everything was done by pocket torches, and we did not even know what the beasts looked like.

Like hunted prey leading predators from their young, some mothers instinctively sacrificed themselves. Recorded one little girl, ten-year-old Mignon Fries:

[S]he told us in a stern voice to go outside to play and under no circumstances to come back in. No matter what we heard, until she herself would come for us, no matter how long it took. Fearfully we looked at her even though we didn’t know exactly what we were afraid of. . . . We went outside and stood around for awhile not knowing what to do, just listening to the noise in the apartment. My mother had just closed all the windows but we could still hear the soldiers talking, laughing and shouting. Then the music started and before long the soldiers were singing. . . .

The day gave way to evening, it got rather chilly and still we were outside and the “party” got noisier. Every once in a while a soldier would open a window and throw an empty vodka bottle outside. Sometimes the music would stop for a while, but the singing and shouting continued. As it got later and later we became very hungry and cold, but having been raised in an atmosphere of strict obedience we didn’t dare go back in the house against our mother’s orders and just huddled against the wall of the shed in the garden trying to keep each other warm. . . .

The music and the singing broke off as suddenly as it had started. . . . Within minutes it was all over and all the soldiers left the house. . . . But it was a long time before our mother finally came out to get us. She was very pale and hugged both of us very tightly for a long time and we could feel her body shaking.

If front-line troops had displayed unpredictability regarding rape, the second wave did not. “All of us, without exception, suffered the same,” revealed one victim.

“And to make matters worse,” added a witness from Neisse, “these atrocities were not committed secretly or in hidden corners but in public, in churches, on the streets, and on the squares. . . . Mothers were raped in the presence of their children, girls were raped in front of their brothers.”

“They . . . raped women and girls . . . in ditches and by the wayside, and as a rule not once but several times,” echoed another viewer. “Sometimes a whole bunch of soldiers would seize hold of one woman and all rape her.”

For those Germans who had naively imagined that they might “win over” the Soviets with kindness and courtesy, they now understood, too late, that Nazi propaganda had in this instance grossly understated the threat, rather than exaggerated it. “[T]he atrocity reports in the newspapers were harmless, compared to reality,” one incredulous victim revealed. While many upright Russian officers courageously stepped in and risked their own lives to stop the murders and rapes, their efforts were little more than a drop of water to a forest fire.

“[A]ll of us knew very well that if the girls were German they could be raped and then shot,” admitted Alexander Solzhenitsyn. “This was almost a combat distinction.”

“There will be no mercy—for no one . . . ,” ran one Soviet general’s order to his men. “It is pointless to ask our troops to exercise mercy.”

“Kill them all, men, old men, children and the women, after you have amused yourself with them! . . . ,” urged [Jewish propagandist] Ilya Ehrenberg in his flaming broadsides. “Kill. Nothing in Germany is guiltless, neither the living nor the yet unborn. . . . Break the racial pride of the German women. Take her as your legitimate booty. Kill, you brave soldiers of the victorious Soviet Army.”

Springing from house to house and victim to victim “like wild beasts,” the drunken horde was determined to embrace such words as the above at their literal worst.

“When the Russians eventually tired of looting, robbing, murdering, and ill-treating the women and girls, they set fire to a considerable part of the village and razed it to the ground,” said a survivor of Schoenwald, the small community that had dismissed rumors of Russian ruthlessness and opted to welcome them instead.

Much like Schoenwald, one town after another was swiftly enveloped by the howling red storm . . . with the same results.

“And as we were then hauled out of the cellar,” recalled a woman who, along with her mother and grandmother had been raped repeatedly, “and as they stood there with their machine guns, my mother said, ‘Well, now we’ll probably be shot.’ And I said, ‘It’s all the same to me.’ It really was all the same to me.”

You can imagine Asian cruelty. . . . “Frau, come,” that was the slogan. “Frau, come.” And I was so furious, because I’d had it up to here. . . . [H]e had me in such a clinch I couldn’t free myself, with my elbow I hit him in the pit of his stomach. That definitely hurt him, and he yelled, “You, I shoot.” And he was brandishing this kind of machine gun around my nose and then I said, “Then shoot.” Yelled it, yelled it just like he did. “Then shoot.”

Though this woman miraculously lived, many who offered even token resistance did not. Wrote a witness from Bauschdorf:

Emilie Ertelt . . . wanted to protect her fifteen-year old daughter, who had been raped sixteen times on one and the same day. Holding a lighted candle in her hand, Mrs. Ertelt, and all those present in the room began to pray for her daugh- ter. . . .[F]our shots were suddenly fired at us. After a few moments some more Russians appeared and started shooting at Mrs. Ertelt, wounding her in the head. The blood streamed down her face, and the nuns who were present went to her assistance and bandaged her head. Soon afterwards another Russian appeared, a brutal-looking fellow . . . and fired a shot at close range. Mrs. Ertelt was killed instantaneously.

Surrounded by Soviets, flight was simply not a sane option for females—and yet, some tried. One young teacher from Kriescht ran terror-stricken into the nearby woods. The woman was soon found, however, and, according to a chronicler, “They drove her out on the road stark naked, and many soldiers used her one after the other. She reached her village crawling on hands and knees along the ditch, through mud and snow.”

Another group of females found temporary haven in a woodland barn near Schoeneiche. But again, the refuge was swiftly discovered. Remembered one who was there:

They burst in, drunk with vodka and with victory, looking for women. When they saw only older women and children hiding behind a pile of carpets, they must have suspected that somewhere younger bodies were being concealed, and they started to ram their bayonets into the carpets. Here and there first and then systematically. . . . Nobody knows how many young girls were killed instantly that night. Eventually, the muffled cries of anguish and pain gave the hiding places away, and the victors started unrolling their prey. They chased those girls that had remained unhurt through the barn. . . . By then the barn looked like a battle field with wounded women on the floor right next to screaming and fighting victims forced to endure repeated and violent acts of rape.

Faced by relentless assaults, with flight out of the question, females tried a variety of stratagems to save themselves. “Some of us tried to make ourselves as unattractive as possible by rouging the tips of our noses, putting gray powder on our upper lips to look like mustaches, and combing out our hair wildly,” revealed Lali Horstmann. Others placed pillows under their dresses and hobbled with sticks to appear like hunchbacks. One crazed woman, clad in an alluring night gown, left her door open purposely to attract soldiers to where she was lying in bed, in the hope of finding a protector. “Two Russians, who had entered for a moment stood speechless. Then both spat in disgust, using a coarse word, shocked to the core by a woman who could offer herself to them. They went on to the room next door, from where soon came cries for help from the girl’s grandmother, aged sixty-nine. Her valiant defense of her honor had made her more attractive than the pretty, too willing girl.” Regarding “willing” women such as the above as “unclean,” Red troops were as likely as not to kill on the spot such individuals.

Many frantic females mistakenly assumed a house of God would provide protection. In fact, churches were usually the rapists’ first stop. Agonized a priest from Neisse:

The girls, women and nuns were raped incessantly for hours on end, the soldiers standing in queues, the officers at the head of the queues, in front of their victims. During the first night many of the nuns and women were raped as many as fifty times. Some of the nuns who resisted with all their strength were shot, others were ill-treated in a dreadful manner until they were too exhausted to offer any resistance. The Russians knocked them down, kicked them, beat them on the head and in the face with the butt-end of their revolvers and rifles, until they finally collapsed and in this unconscious condition became the helpless victims of brutish passion, which was so inhuman as to be inconceivable. The same dreadful scenes were enacted in the hospitals, homes for the aged, and other such institutions. Even nuns who were seventy and eighty years old and were ill and bedridden were raped and ill-treated by these barbarians.

Those women pregnant, on their menstrual cycle, or enduring diarrhea, suffered like all the rest. Nothing, it seemed—not age, ailment or ugliness—could repel the Red rapist. Even death was no defense.

“I  . . . saw some twenty Red Army men standing in line before the corpse of a woman certainly beyond sixty years of age who had been raped to death,” one sickened witness recorded. “They were shouting and laughing and waiting for their satisfaction over her dead body.” As this viewer went on to add, and as numerous examples attest, such ghoulish depravities were not isolated events.

Posted in Uncategorized