Palestinian Women Overpower Israeli Soldier

Palestinian women overpower Israeli soldier bare-handed

Fri Aug 28, 2015 10:45PM

Palestinian women try to prevent an Israeli soldier from arresting a child during an anti-settlement demo in the West Bank village of Nabi Saleh near Ramallah, August 28, 2015. (AFP)

Palestinian women try to prevent an Israeli soldier from arresting a child during an anti-settlement demo in the West Bank village of Nabi Saleh near Ramallah, August 28, 2015. (AFP)

Israeli soldiers have always been notorious for their brutal attacks against Palestinian civilians, especially children. The photos released on Friday have once against testified to the ferocity and savagery of the regime’s armed forces. However, they also depict the commendable courage of the Palestinian women in the face of Tel Aviv’s cruel inhumanity, bearing witness to the fact that the oppressed Muslim nation will never forgo pursuing its inalienable rights.

Israeli armed forces attacked Palestinians during a protest against Tel Aviv’s illegal settlement activities in the occupied West Bank village of Nabi Saleh near Ramallah on Friday.

The photos from the clashes show that an Israeli soldier tried to arrest a Palestinian boy with a broken arm. The soldier placed the boy in a headlock and held him at gunpoint despite his wounded hand.

Following the attack, the Palestinian women present at the scene courageously rushed to stop the Israeli soldier and rescued the boy.

The Israeli soldier also attacked a girl who was trying to prevent him from further hurting the injured boy.

The Palestinians were rallying against the regime’s plan to confiscate more Palestinian lands to expand illegal settlement units in Neve Tzuf (Halamish).

More than half a million Israelis live in over 120 illegal settlements built since Israel’s occupation of the Palestinian territories of the West Bank and East al-Quds in 1967.

A Palestinian protester throws back a tear gas canister at Israeli troops after they attacked Palestinians during an anti-settlement demo near Ramallah, August 28, 2015. (AFP)

Much of the international community regards the Israeli settlements as illegal because the territories were occupied by Israel in 1967, and they are hence subject to the Geneva Conventions, which forbid construction on occupied lands.


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Holocaust Suffering Passed On Through DNA


Jews were forced to work. It will remain in their genes forever.

Jews were forced to work. It will remain in their genes forever.

As the last of the “survivors” of the alleged Jew Holocaust are dying off, the goyim need a new reason to continue to pay Jews unlimited amounts of money forever.

It was a difficult problem for the Jews, but they worked out the perfect solution: the idea that the suffering inflicted on them by Adolf Hitler is being transmitted through their DNA.

Serious expert Rachel Yehuda has a brand new reason White people must give Jews money forever and ever and ever and ever and ever.

Totally serious expert Rachel Yehuda has a brand new reason White people must give Jews money forever and ever and ever and ever and ever.

This is an actual real claim they are now making, and real news outlets are reporting it without criticism.

“Real news outlets” such as The Guardian.

Genetic changes stemming from the trauma suffered by Holocaust survivors are capable of being passed on to their children, the clearest sign yet that one person’s life experience can affect subsequent generations.

The conclusion from a research team at New York’s Mount Sinai hospital led by Rachel Yehuda stems from the genetic study of 32 Jewish men and women who had either been interned in a Nazi concentration camp, witnessed or experienced torture or who had had to hide during the second world war.

They also analysed the genes of their children, who are known to have increased likelihood of stress disorders, and compared the results with Jewish families who were living outside of Europe during the war. “The gene changes in the children could only be attributed to Holocaust exposure in the parents,” said Yehuda.

Her team’s work is the clearest example in humans of the transmission of trauma to a child via what is called “epigenetic inheritance” – the idea that environmental influences such as smoking, diet and stress can affect the genes of your children and possibly even grandchildren.

But it isn’t just The Guardian.

15 more articles.

15 more articles, in case you want to explore it in depth.

This comes after the series of stories wherein Jews claimed that the suffering of the Holocaust was being transmitted through breast milk.

Also in The Guardian.

Also in The Guardian.

There is a group claiming that because this suffering is transmitted from generation to generation, we must not only continue to give unlimited money to Jews, but we must also allow unlimited African immigration into Europe.

True story.

The group is called “Never Ever Again!” Check out their website.

The Guardian tells us of their goals.

Never Ever Again! wants to move from what it calls “melancholic memorialisation” to “positive action”, and is calling for mental health provision to treat inherited trauma, as well as campaigning on various issues, including increased surveillance of fascist groups across Europe, supporting the Human Rights Act and challenging anti-immigration legislation.

It is absolutely insane that we live in a society where Jews are allowed to come up with stuff like this and not be questioned.

Twilight zone jewing intensifies

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The True Nature Of The “Good Book”

Reposted from:



The Holy Bible is a terrorist training manual, it is full of terroristic threats. These threats are aimed at you, they are meant to scare you into submission.  Intimidation is the number one tactic of Jews, and is used frequently by Jewish defense organizations when they claim a terrorist threat is imminent – the one they are sponsoring.

Abe Foxman, director of the ADl, takes an active role in Jewish sponsored terror within the United States and is sponsoring anti-free speech legislation so that you are unable to protest Jewish dominance
Abe Foxman, director of the ADL, takes an active role in Jewish sponsored terror within the United States and is sponsoring anti-free speech legislation so that you are unable to protest Jewish dominance.  Jews wage endless terror on the hated Goyim, and the terroristic threatening started in Jewish holy books with eternal damnation.  Israel did 911 and many New York Jews and organizations were in on it, and have committed treason against the American peoples.

But Abe Foxman and his goons at the ADL aren’t the first Jews to start threatening Goyim, it started way back when with the Holy Bible, a Jewish supremacist manual of terror in the name of God.  For instance, God intending to send you to hell for being guilty of original sin, is a terrorist threat of the priest.  See it for what it is, no god is capable of harming you, but the priest and his army of believers can harm you.


God did not write the Holy Bible, Jewish priests did.  Rabbis are terrorists writing terrorist literature in the name of God.  It is time to see the Holy Bible for what it is, Jewish wickedness, an attempt to achieve psychic domination with a holy book.  No hell or afterlife punishment exists, just the threats of the Jewish priests who use holy literature as an intimidation tactic.

The Holy Bible enlists the Gentiles in the Jewish war of aggression on life.  The Bible is being used to control the Goyim or Gentile masses with mind control, convincing you of afterlife punishment if you don’t fall in line with the wishes of the Jewish god (Rabbi/priest).  You are told to fear and dread god, that almighty one is holy and beyond reproach.  See it for what it is, that is the Jew talking about himself.


Many writers point out that Jews are the original terrorists when they created Israel, but it didn’t start there, the Torah is a book full of Jew terror, told in story form as from Yahweh.  But there is no Jew god Yahweh, he is a fiction of Jewish imagination who is in an imagined war with Satan.  But what really is Satan but the derogatory word for Hinduism, the Sanatan Dharma, and what is the Jew warring against but a life affirming religion.

BIBLE IS JEW WIXKEDNESS who-killed-more-people GO OR SATAN

You are in this war, Americans and all Westerners have been aligned against those resisting Jewish dominance, like the Nazis, who attempted to create a alternative social and political system outside of the evil fiat money system of the Jewish bankers.


The Goyim are being used like toilet paper to achieve the Jewish World Order.  See the truth, see the terror threats of the Jew when they claim you were born only to serve Israel.  When you wake up from the Bible trance then join me in calling for Israel to be nuked off the map.  You are a divine spiritual being, not a meat bag of Jewry!


The Rabbinic class are a terrorist cell, their books are terrorist literature, their holy memes are terroristic threats aimed at your soul, damning you eternally if you don’t obey their laws.  The Jew is a poser, claiming divinity but really a monster.  Proof are the daily headlines, nearly everyday a Rabbi is caught in some scandal like prostitution, organ theft, and child murder.


See the Bible for what it is, Jewish terror.  No god is out to get you, the Jew is out to get you, the Bible is a scam of criminal Jewish masterminds who have the world locked in their central bank lending scam.  The Holy Bible is Jewish wickedness, it is terrorist propaganda, it was written by Jewish psychopaths hellbent on world domination.


Jewish terrorism is the real terrorism in the world and it started with their book.  The Holy Bible is Jewish terrorist literature, threats aimed at you, an imagined god who is angry with you, who will eternally punish you for disobedience.  Such a concept negates free will, it is the rival hominid specie, the Jew Neanderthal, that is angry with you and trying to control you.




Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

How Have They Been Able To Suppress The Truth For So Long?

Below is a selection of facts about the events that transpired during WW2 and the “Holocaust”. Facts that you should have been told about but weren’t because there are some who benefit – in terms of wealth and power – by keeping the rest of us ignorant.



We have aerial photographs of the camps taken throughout the war, there are no gassings, no piles of bodies, and no graves being dug.

We have all of the camp records with listings of everyone who died, 99% of them as a result of disease or starvation directly caused by the allied bombing of the train racks en route to the camps.

We have scrapings from every wall of every gas chamber as proven by the Fred Leuchter report that show that there was no Zyklon B used to kill anyone in those rooms.

We have the photographs taken during the war of those rooms, proving that they were shower rooms or air raid shelters.

We have the fact that over 70% of books written by “survivors” have been publicly shamed and discredited and proven to be fake.

We have the fact that the Italians and French and other peoples occupied by the Germans all agree that they were far kinder than the savage Russians, Americans and British and that they did not commit any rape, unlike the Americans who sent fifty million condoms a month to their soldiers who then made rationing so low that women had to trade their bodies for bread.

The British cracked the German codes in 1942 and were thus able to spy on the Germans without their knowledge for the final three years of the war. In that time, having spied on everyone from the lowest guard to Adolf Hitler himself, the death camps were never mentioned and the killing of Jews was never mentioned.

We have letters proving that senior Nazis were concerned at the death rates resulting from disease and starvation in the camps, and we know that they tried to bring the death tolls down in any way they could.

We know for a fact that all of those people they claim died did not exist on census records before the war and that census records prove there were more Jews after the war than beforehand, which would be categorically impossible if six million of them were dead.

We have the proof that they were evacuated to East Russia and that they then returned in 1944 and after the war.

We know for a fact that many of those they claim died in the camps were actually sent by Eichmann to live in Israel.

We know for a fact due to ground penetrating radar technology that there are no mass graves at the camps, in fact the soil has not been touched in history.

We know for a fact that leading Hollywood directors such as Hitchcock and Billy Wilder were brought in and filmed fake camp scenes, forcing starving or ill Jews to stand up and record several takes.

We know for a fact that the Russians faked their supposed liberation of the camps two weeks after the actual one, drafting in the Jews to pretend they were oppressed.

We know for a fact that Auschwitz was built after the war by the mass murdering Russians, in fact, the January 1995 edition of the prestigious French weekly magazine L’Express acknowledged that “everything” about this “gas chamber” is “false, and that it is in fact a deceitful postwar reconstruction.”

It is a fact that in the 1980’s in Canada in a Royal Court of Law, the world’s leading Holocaust specialist admitted that he had not one single body that he could use as evidence of Germans gassing anyone. Holocaust denial books have been written since the war ended, the truth has been there since day one, it has simply been suppressed.

We know for a fact that Otto Frank hired a man to write his Anne’s “diaries” after the war.

We know for a fact that several thousand photographs have been edited and faked in appallingly unsophisticated amateur ways since 1945, this is the supposed “visual evidence.” Many of the bodies shown were actually dead German guards who starved and died of typhus throughout the war alongside the inmates they looked over, and it is now a proven fact that it was the British who were bulldozing the dead bodies of the starving and diseased into mass graves, not the Germans.

We know for a fact that the first reports of “mass killings” originated with the British propaganda office, something that can hardly be considered a coincidence.

We have the fact that the British are proven liars on this subject, accusing the Germans of all of the exact same crimes in World War One, and then admitting it was a lie and apologising in 1918, and we also know that the Nuremberg trials were packed full of absurd and extraordinary claims against them (including the use of nukes against the Jews), many of which have been debunked and admitted to.

We have the Red Cross records and day-to-day accounts proving that every single camp was well run with medical supplies and food and aid and letters. The camps had swimming pools, football pitches, universities giving out degrees, Germany’s leading dentists and doctors, and even brothels, and we even have wedding certificates from Auschwitz, and other camps.

We know for a fact that the Germans spent a huge amount of time and money shaving the hair of the Jews and delousing all of their clothes and other items so that typhus could not ravage the whole camps, and they were doing a fair job until the allied bombing.

We have the earliest books ever written about the camps which do not mention any gas chambers or mass killings of Jews or any other people (homosexuals, gypsies, etc).

We also know that all of the “evil geniuses” who were supposedly experimenting on human beings moved to America and helped NASA and the space program, living in normal society.

We have the fact that the only Nazis who admitted to war crimes had been horrifically tortured, even the head judge at Nuremberg admitted that the whole thing was a sham.


For the full article and others like it go to:

IFERS stands for International Flat Earth Research Society which deals with the mother of all conspiracies: the one that makes you believe that our Earth is a globe, revolving and spinning and wobbling around itself, the sun, the galaxy. It also deals with NASA lies and hoaxes and all sorts of science frauds.

Posted in Uncategorized

Shechita Is Legalized Cruelty

by Bernard Weckmann

Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights – Article 18

No right-thinking man or woman would have a problem with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It is my understanding that freedom of religion is of paramount importance in a society that bases itself on the rule of law and claims to be a democracy – such as Australia, a signatory to the above declaration.

I hold it as self-evident, however, that in a fair and just society such freedom does NOT extend to granting special privileges and dispensations to any religious group/s to do what is forbidden to all others on penalty of fines and/or imprisonment! It seems, however, that in many countries, Australia amongst them, some humans are deemed more equal than others and deserving of greater rights; to wit:

The Queensland Animal Care And Protection Act 2001 states in Section 18, Subsection 2:

(2) Without limiting subsection (1), a person is taken to be cruel to an animal if the person does any of the following to the animal:

 (g) kills it in a way that

(i) is inhumane; or

(ii) causes it not to die quickly; or

(iii) causes it to die in unreasonable pain

The practice of shechitah/halal slaughter – the slaughter of an animal without prior stunning – is inhumane as it has been proved to cause a prolonged and painful death and thus constitutes an offence under the above-named Act.

An exemption from the requirement of stunning before slaughter on the grounds of freedom of religion is provided for in the above-named Act. Although I have not checked relevant legislation in the other States I think it is safe to assume that it is similarly worded.

Jews and Moslems are the only ones that benefit from this exemption and it is thus reasonable to conclude that it was created especially for them. No, let’s not beat around the bush! And to hell with political correctness: it was created exclusively for Jews! They pay well I guess! It is only Jews who everywhere clamour for acceptance and equality and as soon as they have achieved it start to vociferously demand special treatment!

Moslems are simply riding piggyback. Islamic authorities are generally compassionate and willing to comply with the law’s requirements. In a letter to the R.S.P.C.A. the Imam of Woking Mosque wrote on 4th September, 1928, that in his opinion stunning does not conflict with the instructions given in the Koran.

I have no doubts, based on my personal experience with Moslems, that they, unlike Jews, can be reasoned with; to wit:

“Muslims in New Zealand and elsewhere have already adopted stunning prior to slaughter. They use a form of electrical stunning which animals quickly recover from if not slaughtered, proving that the stunned animal is “healthy”, thereby qualifying as halal.”

It is only Jews who stubbornly persist in the barbaric practice of shechita (amongst many other unsavoury practices) while arrogantly presenting themselves to the nations of the world as nothing less than a light, a beacon of righteousness and justice, the moral and intellectual vanguard of the human race.

But then again, what kind of compassion can you expect of a people that callously subjects its new-born baby boys to the cruelty of ritual genital mutilation without anaesthesia.

Being thrown to the ground and having one’s throat cut from ear to ear and then slowly bleeding to death must be an excruciatingly painful experience for any living creature. You do not need to be a veterinarian in order to understand that! Common sense and empathy ought to be enough!

But if it is expert opinions you want here are some:

“In 1933, a questionnaire was sent to 605 Dutch Veterinary Surgeons, with the result that 500 (five hundred out of 605!) condemned the Jewish method as unjustifiable.”

“The following year, the Melbourne Argus (29th Aug.) published reports from Chief Inspectors to the Health Committee, New South Wales, who almost unanimously condemned Shechita on account of its cruelty.”

“Perhaps the most authoritative condemnation of the Jewish method of cattle-slaughter was a report made by an Admiralty Committee in 1904; this committee was interested in the matter from the point of view of rationing the navy’s food. The report was backed by two physiologists, Professor E. H. Starling, Jodrell Professor of Physiology, London University College, and Sir Michael Foster, Professor of Physiology at Cambridge. The report’ s conclusions were that “the Jewish system fails in the primary requirements of rapidity, freedom from unnecessary pain and instantaneous loss of sensibility” and that “until some method is devised for rendering the animal unconscious, it should not be permitted under any establishment under Government control.” That, surely, is definite enough; but this report, 35 years old, has simply been pigeon-holed and nothing has been done about it.”

The above quotes are from:

The Legalised Cruelty Of Shechita:

The Jewish Method Of Cattle-Slaughter

by Arnold Leese

This booklet was published decades ago but is as relevant now as it was then. It can be downloaded here: Shechita


Some would claim that Leese was a fascist, an apologist for Hitler and National Socialism which only increases my respect for him. It was Hitler’s Germany, after all, that legislated the most enlightened animal protection laws.



The 30-day period which I granted to the Federal Minister for Agriculture (Barnaby Joyce) and to the Attorney-General (George Brandis) to respond to my request to show cause exactly why Jews and Moslems should be exempt from the provisions of the law which requires stunning has now expired. I think that this period was adequate. They have chosen to remain silent.

Their silence in this matter is their tacit confirmation that no lawful grounds exist to grant anyone a special dispensation from the requirements of the law.

Their failure to show lawful cause is furthermore tacit admission that cruelty to animal has been legalized and cruelty-to-animal offences are tacitly aided and abetted by the government on the pretext of “freedom of religion”.

I cannot single-handedly eliminate this revolting practice – but I can and will unapologetically point the finger at its benighted practitioners, the Jews!

I do not know – although I could venture an educated guess! – whom the politicians and the public servants in the State and Federal governments in Australia serve. And it’s not the Australian people!

I would love to say to Australian politicians: “Shame on you!” But I know that would be a waste of breath. To feel shame would require a conscience.

It was Napoleon Buonaparte who said: “In politics stupidity is not an obstacle”. Let me add a thought of my own: “In politics lack of a conscience is not an obstacle either!”

Our Local, State and Federal politicians routinely prove both of the above statements correct! But in order to put an end to the barbaric practice of shechita we do not need to wait for politicians to change the law. Come to think of it: do we actually ever need these clowns for anything?

Mr Leese offers a solution which would allow the RSPCA, if it were so inclined, to act without having to wait for any changes in the law. It would be as workable in Australia today as it would have been in the UK of his time. Here is how:

The above-mentioned Act – and all similar Acts – allows shechita only if the meat is intended to be food for Jews. The laws of kashrut (dietary laws) demand that a certain nerve and some forbidden fats are removed from the carcass before it qualifies as kosher, a process called “porging”. This is a time-consuming task and not every butcher is skilled enough to perform it. But as it is a sizeable portion of the carcass it is not simply discarded but sold on to be used as food by non-Jews.

Not only is this morally reprehensible because the true nature of the meat is not disclosed to the non-Jewish consumer which thus takes away the consumer’s informed choice but it is a clear violation of the law which specifies that the meat can only be used as food for Jews.

The RSPCA need only send inspectors into Jewish slaughterhouses to keep a watchful eye on the shochet (Jewish slaughterer) in order to ascertain whether the carcass is porged.

If the carcass is not porged – that’s the reality in the majority of cases! – the slaughterer is breaking the law as part of the carcass is now going to be consumed by non-Jews. Leese thought that enough prosecutions could be secured in this way in just one day of observation that this revolting practice could end kosher slaughter in no time at all and I agree with him!

If only the RSPCA had the will to do this! I feel sure that it would find it has the full support of the majority of Australians!

So what are we waiting for?







Posted in Uncategorized

The Origins of World War 2



Dirty Little Secrets Of WWII

The Hidden, Awkward Origins Of World War 2

by Jason Collett

The startling views of four key diplomats who were close to events

Just consider the following:

  • Joseph P. Kennedy, U.S. Ambassador to Britain during the years immediately preceding WW2 was the father of the famous American Kennedy dynasty. James Forrestal the first US Secretary of Defense (1947-1949) quotes him as saying “Chamberlain (the British Prime Minister) stated that America and the world Jews had forced England into the war”. (The Forrestal Diaries Millis, Cassell 1952 p129).


  • Count Jerzy Potocki, the Polish Ambassador in Washington, in a report to the Polish Foreign Office in January 1939, is quoted approvingly by the highly respected British military historian Major-General JFC Fuller. Concerning public opinion in America he says “Above all, propaganda here is entirely in Jewish hands…when bearing public ignorance in mind, their propaganda is so effective that people have no real knowledge of the true state of affairs in Europe… It is interesting to observe that in this carefully thought-out campaign… no reference at all is made to Soviet Russia. If that country is mentioned, it is referred to in a friendly manner and people are given the impression that Soviet Russia is part of the democratic group of countries… Jewry was able not only to establish a dangerous centre in the New World for the dissemination of hatred and enmity, but it also succeeded in dividing the world into two warlike camps…President Roosevelt has been given the power.. to create huge reserves in armaments for a future war which the Jews are deliberately heading for.” (Fuller, JFC: The Decisive Battles of the Western World vol 3 pp 372-374.)


  • Hugh Wilson, the American Ambassador in Berlin until 1938, the year before the war broke out, found anti-Semitism in Germany ‘understandable’. This was because before the advent of the Nazis, “the stage, the press, medicine and law [were] crowded with Jews…among the few with money to splurge, a high proportion [were] Jews…the leaders of the Bolshevist movement in Russia, a movement desperately feared in Germany, were Jews. One could feel the spreading resentment and hatred.” (Hugh Wilson: Diplomat between the Wars, Longmans 1941, quoted in Leonard Mosley, Lindbergh, Hodder 1976).


  • Sir Nevile Henderson, British Ambassador in Berlin ‘said further that the hostile attitude in Great Britain was the work of Jews and enemies of the Nazis, which was what Hitler thought himself’ (Taylor, AJP: The Origins of the Second World War Penguin 1965, 1987 etc p 324).

Is all of this merely attributable to terrible antisemitism?

The economic background to the war is necessary for a fuller understanding, before casting judgement on the originators of these viewpoints.

At the end of the First World War, Germany was essentially tricked [see Paul Johnson A History of the Modern World (1983) p24 and H Nicholson Peacemaking 1919 (1933) pp13-16] into paying massive reparations to France and other economic competitors and former belligerent countries in terms of the so-called Treaty of Versailles, thanks to the liberal American President Woodrow Wilson. Germany was declared to be solely responsible for the war, in spite of the fact that ‘Germany did not plot a European war, did not want one, and made genuine efforts, though too belated, to avert one.’ (Professor Sydney B Fay The Origins of the World War (vol. 2 p 552)).

As a result of these massive enforced financial reparations, by 1923 the situation in Germany became desperate and inflation on an astronomical scale became the only way out for the government. Printing presses were engaged to print money around the clock. In 1921 the exchange rate was 75 marks to the dollar. By 1924 this had become about 5 trillion marks to the dollar. This virtually destroyed the German middle class (Koestler The God that Failed p 28), reducing any bank savings to a virtual zero.

According to Sir Arthur Bryant the British historian (Unfinished Victory (1940 pp. 136-144):

‘It was the Jews with their international affiliations and their hereditary flair for finance who were best able to seize such opportunities.. They did so with such effect that, even in November 1938, after five years of anti-Semitic legislation and persecution, they still owned, according to the Times correspondent in Berlin, something like a third of the real property in the Reich. Most of it came into their hands during the inflation.. But to those who had lost their all this bewildering transfer seemed a monstrous injustice. After prolonged sufferings they had now been deprived of their last possessions. They saw them pass into the hands of strangers, many of whom had not shared their sacrifices and who cared little or nothing for their national standards and traditions.. The Jews obtained a wonderful ascendancy in politics, business and the learned professions (in spite of constituting) less than one percent of the population.. The banks, including the Reichsbank and the big private banks, were practically controlled by them. So were the publishing trade, the cinema, the theatres and a large part of the press – all the normal means, in fact, by which public opinion in a civilized country is formed.. The largest newspaper combine in the country with a daily circulation of four millions was a Jewish monopoly.. Every year it became harder and harder for a gentile to gain or keep a foothold in any privileged occupation.. At this time it was not the ‘Aryans’ who exercised racial discrimination. It was a discrimination that operated without violence. It was exercised by a minority against a majority. There was no persecution, only elimination.. It was the contrast between the wealth enjoyed – and lavishly displayed – by aliens of cosmopolitan tastes, and the poverty and misery of native Germans, that has made anti-Semitism so dangerous and ugly a force in the new Europe. Beggars on horseback are seldom popular, least of all with those whom they have just thrown out of the saddle.’

Goodness gracious, Sir Arthur! What made you get out of the wrong side of the bed?

Strangely enough, a book unexpectedly published by Princeton University Press in 1984, Sarah Gordon (Hitler, Germans and the “Jewish Question”) essentially confirms what Bryant says. According to her, ‘Jews were never a large percentage of the total German population; at no time did they exceed 1% of the population during the years 1871-1933.’ But she adds ‘Jews were over-represented in business, commerce, and public and private service.. They were especially visible in private banking in Berlin, which in 1923 had 150 private Jewish banks, as opposed to only 11 private non-Jewish banks.. They owned 41% of iron and scrap iron firms and 57% of other metal businesses.. Jews were very active in the stock market, particularly in Berlin, where in 1928 they comprised 80% of the leading members of the stock exchange. By 1933, when the Nazis began eliminating Jews from prominent positions, 85% of the brokers on the Berlin Stock exchange were dismissed because of their “race”.. At least a quarter of full professors and instructors (at German universities) had Jewish origins.. In 1905-6 Jewish students comprised 25% of the law and medical students.. In 1931, 50% of the 234 theatre directors in Germany were Jewish, and in Berlin the number was 80%.. In 1929 it was estimated that the per capita income of Jews in Berlin was twice that of other Berlin residents..’ etc etc.

Arthur Koestler confirms the Jewish over-involvement in German publishing. ‘Ullstein’s was a kind of super-trust; the largest organization of its kind in Europe, and probably In the world. They published four daily papers in Berlin alone, among these the venerable Vossische Zeitung, founded in the eighteenth century, and the B.Z. am Mittag, an evening paper.. Apart from these, Ullstein’s published more than a dozen weekly and monthly periodicals, ran their own news service, their own travel agency, etc., and were one of the leading book publishers. The firm was owned by the brothers Ullstein – they were five, like the original Rothschild brothers, and like them also, they were Jews.’ (The God that Failed (1950) ed. RHS Crossman, p 31).

Edgar Mowrer, Berlin correspondent for the Chicago Daily News, wrote an anti-German tract called Germany Puts the Clock Back (published as a Penguin Special and reprinted five times between December 1937 and April 1938). He nevertheless notes ‘In the all-important administration of Prussia, any number of strategic positions came into the hands of Hebrews.. A telephone conversation between three Jews in Ministerial offices could result in the suspension of any periodical or newspaper in the state.. The Jews came in Germany to play in politics and administration that same considerable part that they had previously won by open competition in business, trade, banking, the Press, the arts, the sciences and the intellectual and cultural life of the country. And thereby the impression was strengthened that Germany, a country with a mission of its own, had fallen into the hands of foreigners.’

Mowrer says ‘No one who lived through the period from 1919 to 1926 is likely to forget the sexual promiscuity that prevailed.. Throughout a town like Berlin, hotels and pensions made vast fortunes by letting rooms by the hour or day to baggageless, unregistered guests. Hundreds of cabarets, pleasure resorts and the like served for purposes of getting acquainted and acquiring the proper mood..’ (pp. 153-4). Bryant describes throngs of child prostitutes outside the doors of the great Berlin hotels and restaurants. He adds ‘Most of them (the night clubs and vice-resorts) were owned and managed by Jews. And it was the Jews.. among the promoters of this trade who were remembered in after years.’ (pp. 144-5).

Douglas Reed, Chief Central European correspondent before WWII for the London Times, was profoundly anti-German and anti-Hitler. But nevertheless he reported: ‘I watched the Brown Shirts going from shop to shop with paint pots and daubing on the window panes the word “Jew”, in dripping red letters. The Kurfürstendamm was to me a revelation. I knew that Jews were prominent in business life, but I did not know that they almost monopolized important branches of it. Germany had one Jew to one hundred gentiles, said the statistics; but the fashionable Kurfürstendamm, according to the dripping red legends, had about one gentile shop to ninety-nine Jewish ones.’ (Reed Insanity Fair (1938) p. 152-3). In Reed’s book Disgrace Abounding of the following year he notes ‘In the Berlin (of pre-Hitler years) most of the theatres were Jewish-owned or Jewish-leased, most of the leading film and stage actors were Jews, the plays performed were often by German, Austrian or Hungarian Jews and were staged by Jewish film producers, applauded by Jewish dramatic critics in Jewish newspapers.. The Jews are not cleverer than the Gentiles, if by clever you mean good at their jobs. They ruthlessly exploit the common feeling of Jews, first to get a foothold in a particular trade or calling, then to squeeze the non-Jews out of it.. It is not true that Jews are better journalists than Gentiles. They held all the posts on those Berlin papers because the proprietors and editors were Jewish’ (pp238-9).

The Jewish writer Edwin Black notes ‘For example, in Berlin alone, about 75% of the attorneys and nearly as many of the doctors were Jewish.’ (Black, The Transfer Agreement (1984) p58.

To cap it all, Jews were perceived as dangerous enemies of Germany after Samuel Untermeyer, the leader of the World Jewish Economic Federation, declared war on Germany on August 6 1933. (Edwin Black The Transfer Agreement: the Untold Story of the Secret Pact between the Third Reich and Palestine (1984) pp272-277) According to Black, ‘The one man who most embodied the potential death blow to Germany was Samuel Untermeyer.’ (p 369). This was the culmination of a worldwide boycott of German goods led by international Jewish organizations. The London Daily Express on March 24, 1933 carried the headline Judea Declares War on Germany. The boycott was particularly motivated by the German imposition of the Nuremberg Laws, which ironically were similar in intent and content to the Jewish cultural exclusivism practiced so visibly in present-day Israel (Hannah Arendt Eichmann in Jerusalem p 7).

Hitler saw the tremendous danger posed to Germany by Communism. He appreciated the desperate need to eliminate this threat, a fact that earned him the immense hatred and animosity of the Jewish organisations and the media and politicians of the west which they could influence. After all, according to the Jewish writer Chaim Bermant, although Jews formed less than five percent of Russia’s population, they formed more than fifty percent of its revolutionaries. According to the Jewish writer Chaim Bermant in his book The Jews (1977, chapter 8):

‘It must be added that most of the leading revolutionaries who convulsed Europe in the final decades of the last century and the first decades of this one, stemmed from prosperous Jewish families.. They were perhaps typified by the father of revolution, Karl Marx.. Thus when, after the chaos of World War I, revolutions broke out all over Europe, Jews were everywhere at the helm; Trotsky, Sverdlov, Kamenev and Zinoviev in Russia, Bela Kun in Hungary, Kurt Eisner in Bavaria, and, most improbable of all, Rosa Luxemburg in Berlin.

‘To many outside observers, the Russian revolution looked like a Jewish conspiracy, especially when it was followed by Jewish-led revolutionary outbreaks in much of central Europe. The leadership of the Bolshevik Party had a preponderance of Jews.. Of the seven members of the Politburo, the inner cabinet of the country, four, Trotsky (Bronstein), Zinoviev (Radomsky), Kamenev (Rosenfeld) and Sverdlov, were Jews.’ Other authors agree with this:

“There has been a tendency to circumvent or simply ignore the significant role of Jewish intellectuals in the German Communist Party, and thereby seriously neglect one of the genuine and objective reasons for increased anti-Semitism during and after World War 1.. The prominence of Jews in the revolution and early Weimar Republic is indisputable, and this was a very serious contributing cause for increased anti-Semitism in post-war years.. It is clear then that the stereotype of Jews as socialists and communists.. led many Germans to distrust the Jewish minority as a whole and to brand Jews as enemies of the German nation.” (Sarah Gordon Hitler, Germans and the ‘Jewish Question’ Princeton University Press (1984) p 23).

“The second paroxysm of strong anti-Semitism came after the critical role of Jews in International Communism and the Russian Revolution and during the economic crises of the 1920s and 30s… Anti-Semitism intensified throughout Europe and North America following the perceived and actual centrality of Jews in the Russian Revolution.. Such feelings were not restricted to Germany, or to vulgar extremists like the Nazis. All over Northern Europe and North America, anti-Semitism became the norm in ‘nice society’, and ‘nice society’ included the universities.” (Martin Bernal, Black Athena vol. 1 pp. 367, 387).

“The major role Jewish leaders played in the November (Russian) revolution was probably more important than any other factor in confirming (Hitler’s) anti-Semitic beliefs.” (J&S Pool, Who Financed Hitler, p.164).

Hitler came to power in Germany with two main aims, the rectification of the unjust provisions of the Versailles Treaty, and the destruction of the Soviet/ Communist threat to Germany. Strangely enough, contrary to the mythology created by those who had an opposing ethnic agenda, he had no plans or desire for a larger war of conquest. Professor AJP Taylor showed this in his book The Origins of the Second World War, to the disappointment of the professional western political establishment. Taylor says, “The state of German armament in 1939 gives the decisive proof that Hitler was not contemplating general war, and probably not intending war at all” (p.267), and “Even in 1939 the German army was not equipped for a prolonged war; and in 1940 the German land forces were inferior to the French in everything except leadership” (p104-5). What occurred in Europe in 1939-41 was the result of unforeseen weaknesses and a tipping of the balance of power, and Hitler was an opportunist ‘who took advantages whenever they offered themselves’ (Taylor). Britain and France declared war on Germany, not the other way around. Hitler wanted peace with Britain, as the German generals admitted (Basil Liddell Hart, The Other Side of the Hill 1948, Pan Books 1983) with regard to the so-called Halt Order at Dunkirk, where Hitler had the opportunity to capture the entire British Army, but chose not to. Liddell Hart, one of Britain’s most respected military historians, quotes the German General von Blumentritt with regard to this Halt Order:

“He (Hitler) then astonished us by speaking with admiration of the British Empire, of the necessity for its existence, and of the civilisation that Britain had brought into the world. He remarked, with a shrug of the shoulders, that the creation of its Empire had been achieved by means that were often harsh, but ‘where there is planing, there are shavings flying’. He compared the British Empire with the catholic Church – saying they were both essential elements of stability in the world. He said that all he wanted from Britain was that she should acknowledge Germany’s position on the Continent. The return of Germany’s colonies would be desirable but not essential, and he would even offer to support Britain with troops if she should be involved in difficulties anywhere..” (p 200).

According to Liddell Hart, “At the time we believed that the repulse of the Luftwaffe in the ‘Battle over Britain’ had saved her. That is only part of the explanation, the last part of it. The original cause, which goes much deeper, is that Hitler did not want to conquer England. He took little interest in the invasion preparations, and for weeks did nothing to spur them on; then, after a brief impulse to invade, he veered around again and suspended the preparations. He was preparing, instead, to invade Russia” (p140).

David Irving in the foreword to his book The Warpath (1978) refers to “the discovery.. that at no time did this man (Hitler) pose or intend a real threat to Britain or the Empire.”

This gives a completely different complexion, not only to the war, but to the successful suppression of this information during the war and afterwards. Historians today know only too well where the boundaries lie within which they can paint their pictures of the war and its aftermath, and the consequences of venturing beyond those boundaries, irrespective of the evidence. Unfortunately, only too few of them have been prepared to have the courage to break out of this dreadful straitjacket of official and unofficial censorship.



Posted in Uncategorized

Dostoyevsky On The Jews

by Dr William Pierce


F Dostoyevsky



Feodor M. Dostoievsky (1821-1881) was one of Russia’s greatest writers. The son of a physician of modest means, he had the opportunity for an education, and was trained as an engineer. He remained close to the common people of Russia, however, in the experiences of his life and in his writing.

Dostoievsky was a fervent patriot, but his association with a circle of radical writers led to his arrest at the age of 27. He was subsequently sentenced to death, reprieved at the last minute, and transported to Siberia, where he spent four years in a prison labor camp. This was followed by several years as a private in a Siberian unit in the Russian army.

After his return from Siberia Dostoievsky wrote a number of novels, including Crime and Punishment (1866), The Idiot (1868), The Possessed (1871), and The Brothers Karamazov (1880), all of which enjoyed immense popularity. It was his Diary of a Writer, however, published in a number of installments in the period 1873-1881 which most explicitly stated his feeling for his people and for Russia.

Dostoievsky’s Diary dealt with a great many issues of burning interest to his fellow countrymen, showing clearly the insight and sensitivity which made him one of the most beloved of all the great writers Russia has produced. Boris Brasol, who translated Diary of a Writer into English, has described the reaction of the Russian people to Dostoievsky’s death on February 9th, 1881:

The news of Dostoievsky’s passing spread instantly, like an electric current, to the remotest parts of Russia, and a wave of mourning swept through the hearts of her saddened people… Enormous crowds attended his funeral: men and women from all walks of life — statesmen of high rank and downtrodden prostitutes; illiterate peasants and distinguished men of letters; army officers and learned scientists; credulous priests and incredulous students — they were all there.Whom did Russia bury with so great a reverence? Was it only one of her famous men of letters? Indeed not: in that coffin lay a noble and lofty man, a prudent teacher, an inspired prophet whose thoughts, like mountain peaks, were always pointed toward heaven, and who had measured the depths of man’s quivering heart with all its struggles, sins, and tempests; its riddles, pains, and sorrows; its unseen tears and burning passions….

As much as his people loved him, Dostoievsky in turn loved them — and despised their enemies and exploiters. Foremost among the latter were the Jews of Russia. In Dostoievsky’s time there were some three million of them, some descended from the Khazars, an Asiatic tribe of southern Russia which had converted to Judaism a millennium earlier, and some who had flocked into Russia from the West during the Middle Ages, when they were forcibly expelled from every country in western and central Europe.

Scorning honest labor, the Jews had fastened themselves on the Russian peasants and craftsmen like an army of leeches. Money-lending, the liquor trade, and White slavery were their preferred means of support — and their means of destroying the Russian people.

So great was the Russians’ hate for their Jewish tormenters that the Russian rulers were obliged to institute special legislation, both protecting the Jews and limiting their depredations against the Russian people. Among the latter was a ban against Jewish settlement in central Russia; they were restricted to the regions of western and southwestern Russia (the “Pale of Settlement”) where they had been most heavily concentrated at the time Catherine the Great had proclaimed the ban, in the 18th century.

This, of course, was regarded by the Jews as “persecution,” and it was their incessant wailing about not being allowed to fasten themselves on the people of central Russia which first moved Dostoievsky to set his pen to paper on the Jewish question. In the section of his Diary published in March 1877, the writer remarked:

… I know that in the whole world there is certainly no other people who would be complaining as much about their lot, incessantly, after each step and word of theirs — about their humiliation, their suffering, their martyrdom. One might think it is not they who are reigning in Europe, who are directing there at least the stock exchanges and, therefore, politics, domestic affairs, the morality of the states.

Dostoievsky, who had become all too familiar with Jews and their personal attitudes toward their Russian hosts, first as a boy on his parent’s small estate, where he observed the Jew’s dealings with the local peasants, and later in prison, where he noted the aloof behavior of the Jewish prisoners toward Russian prisoners, went on to speculate about what would happen to the Russians if the Jews ever got the whiphand:

… Now, how would it be if in Russia there were not three million Jews, but three million Russians, and there were eighty million Jews — well, into what would they convert the Russians and how would they treat them? Would they permit them to acquire equal rights? Would they permit them to worship freely in their midst? Wouldn’t they convert them into slaves? Worse than that: wouldn’t they skin them altogether? Wouldn’t they slaughter them to the last man, to the point of complete extermination, as they used to do with aliens in ancient times, during their ancient history?

This speculation turned out to be grimly prophetic, for only a little more than four decades later bloodthirsty Jewish commissars, who made up the bulk of the Bolshevik leaders, were supervising the butchering of Russians by the millions.

Dostoievsky correctly identified the secret of the Jews’ strength — indeed, of their very survival over a period of 40 centuries — as their exclusiveness, their deeply ingrained mental outlook upon the whole non-Jewish world as an alien, inferior, and hostile thing. This outlook led the Jews to always think of themselves as having a special situation or standing. Even when they were trying most ingratiatingly to convince the non-Jews that Jews were just like everyone else, they maintained the inner attitude of a people who constituted a special community within the larger, Gentile community. Dostoievsky pointed out:

… It is possible to outline, at least, certain symptoms of that status in statu — be it only externally. These symptoms are: alienation and estrangement in the matter of religious dogma; the impossibility of fusion; belief that in the world there exists but one national entity, the Jew, while, even though other entities exist, nevertheless, it should be presumed that they are, as it were, nonexistent. ‘Step out of the family of nations and form your own entity, and thou shalt know that henceforth thou art the only one before God; exterminate the rest, or make slaves of them. Have faith in the conquest of the whole world; adhere to the belief that everything will submit to thee. Loathe strictly everything, and do not have intercourse with anyone in thy mode of living. And even when thou shalt lose the land, thy political individuality, even when thou shalt be dispersed all over the face of the earth, amidst all nations — never mind, have faith in everything that has been promised thee, once and forever; believe that all this will come to pass, and meanwhile live, loathe, unite, and exploit — and wait, wait ….

Is it any wonder that, although virtually every American with a high school education has either read Dostoievsky’s Crime and Punishment or his The Brothers Karamazov (or both), his Diary of a Writer has been quietly consigned to oblivion by the controlled educational and publishing establishments in this country? The only printing of Diary of a Writer currently listed in Books in Print is one issued by a small, specialty publisher (Octagon Books) for sale to libraries and priced at a prohibitive $47.50. That price tag ought to keep it safely out of the hands of curious American readers!

Those fortunate enough to be able to borrow a copy of the book can read a great many more of Dostoievsky’s penetrating comments on the behavior of and attitude of the Jews in Russia toward the Russian people during the 19th century. Dostoievsky especially condemned the exploitation of the poor, ignorant, and helpless Russian peasants by the voraciously greedy and utterly heartless Jews. For example:

Thus, Jewry is thriving precisely there where the people are still ignorant, or not free, or economically backward. It is there that Jewry has a champ libre. And instead of raising, by its influence, the level of education, instead of increasing knowledge, generating economic fitness in the native population — instead of this the Jew, wherever he has settled, has still more humiliated and debauched the people; there humaneness was still more debased and the educational level fell still lower; there inescapable, inhuman misery, and with it despair, spread still more disgustingly. Ask the native population in our border regions: What is propelling the Jew — and has been propelling him for centuries? You will receive a unanimous answer: mercilessness. ‘He has been prompted so many centuries only by pitilessness to us, only by the thirst for our sweat and blood.’And, in truth, the whole activity of the Jews in these border regions of ours consisted of rendering the native population as much as possible inescapably dependent on them, taking advantage of the local laws. They have always managed to be on friendly terms with those upon whom the people were dependent. Point to any other tribe from among Russian aliens which could rival the Jew by his dreadful influence in this connection! You will find no such tribe. In this respect the Jew preserves all his originality as compared with other Russian aliens, and of course, the reason therefore is that status of statu of his, that spirit of which specifically breathes pitilessness for everything that is not Jew, with disrespect for any people and tribe, for every human creature who is not a Jew….

Now, what if somehow, for some reason, our rural commune [i.e., the institutionalized system of Russian peasant society] should disintegrate, that commune which is protecting our poor native peasant against so many ills; what if, straightaway, the Jew and his whole kehillah [i.e., organized Jewry] should fall upon that liberated peasant — so inexperienced, so incapable of resisting temptation, and who up to this time has been guarded precisely by the commune? Why, of course, instantly this would be his end; his entire property, his whole strength, the very next day would come under the power of the Jew, and there would ensue such an era as can be compared not only with the era of serfdom but even with that of the Tartar yoke.

Again, how tragically prophetic!

National Vanguard, Issue no. 72, 1979. This article was transcribed by William Wilson from The Best of Attack and National Vanguard 1970-1982, edited by Kevin Alfred Strom, copyright 1984 National Vanguard Books, Box 330, Hillsboro WV 24946 USA.


Just how right Dostoyevsky was and just what will happen to non-Jews should we fail to rein in the Yid you can read here:

Ukraine-The Other Holocaust (9 MB)

Sea Of Blood


Posted in Uncategorized